"A902"

THE BACKWARDS 209A ABUSE LAW SITE


  Law and court procedures that are "fair on  their faces" but administered "with an evil eye
     or a heavyhand" are discriminatory and violate  the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth  Amendment  .Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 US 356

 
 

SAGA OF THE  $15,000 REPORT CARD

In December 1998 I requested, in person and in writing, a copy of my son’s 
high school report card. I never heard anything from back from the school. 

Consequently I filed a suit in Worcester Superior Court requesting I be 
given a copy of the report card. I named my ex-wife Linda S. Wright Bowyer, the 
school, the town, and the attorney for my ex as defendants who were denying 
my rights to my son’s information. Cheryl Jacques firm showed up for the 
town.  I do not know  how they got connected.    The lawyers all claimed the 
matter to be P&F Court  jurisdiction although the Chapter 71 sec 34  B,D,E 
are in the Superior Court jurisdiction.  Eventually the Judge decided this 
was a special case to the rights provided by M71 Sec 34 B,D,E, and M208 Sec. 
31.  Decision:  I had no rights to my sons information.  To get to this 
point we had  had several hearings and exchanged a variety of motions, and 
briefs: Me and four lawyers fighting over one report card.  Could this be 
what the drafting fathers had in mind?  As I was also busy in P&F Court 
working on this issue, I let the Appeal period pass. 

At the next M209A hearing, neither the Judge nor the ex was receptive to my 
receiving information I had been receiving for several years prior to the 
passage of the Report Card Law.  That I had concocted no evil plans or taken 
any improper actions with the report card made no difference.  What the hell 
could I have done with it?  So I was denied access by the P&F Court.  A law 
that was supposed to help me backfired. 

I am now in the process of appealing  this denial.  The ex’s attorney must 
send in his appeal brief response to my brief  in 30 days.  Guess what I got 
the mail yesterday?     Yes,  I got a copy of the mysterious elusive $15,000 
REPORT CARD.   The boy is passing and doing OK in his classes. 

The $15,000 REPORT CARD could have been provided without all this 
aggravation and hassle. Clearly the ex  would rather exhibit vindictive 
behavior and deny this father a little information about his children.  The 
cost of her vindictiveness is at least $15,000 in  legal fees plus an Appeal 
brief to finished. 

Now I wonder what the effect of the receipt of the $15,000 REPORT CARD will 
be on the Appeal?  The paranoiac in me thinks there must be a trick in here 
somewhere. 
 
 

Bill from VA

 

When the law is against you, argue the facts. When the facts are against you, argue the law. When both are against you, attack the plaintiff.